|
INTERNET
TOP MYTHS
The
Internet is the modern-day version of the wild frontier or the Old West
-- no laws apply and it's every man for himself.
If you believe this, you couldn't be more wrong. While the Internet is
a relatively new medium that has raised some novel legal issues, it is
well-established that the laws governing copyrights and trademarks --
as well as other aspects of business and personal and commercial expression
-- apply as much to the virtual world as they do to the "real"
one. So, if you're going to publish a web page that contains anything
other than entirely original content, that is, text that you wrote, photos
you took or graphics you created yourself, you need to familiarize yourself
with and abide by the copyright laws, among other things, or risk suffering
the sometimes serious consequences if you don't.
[
back to top]
If
someone posts something on the Internet -- text, a picture or icon, a
sound or video clip -- it's up for grabs or "in the public domain",
so I can take it and use it however I want.
Wrong again. In fact, publication on the Web has become almost as common
as, and from a legal standpoint is really no different from, publication
in the traditional print or broadcast formats. Most newspapers, magazines,
television networks and other news and entertainment organizations have
Web sites that compliment their more traditional TV, radio or print publishing
activities. In fact, some commercial magazines and news sources -- such
as Salon and Slate -- are published exclusively on the Web. Other businesses,
like record labels, use the Web essentially as a means of interactive
advertising, offering such things as exclusive photos and sound or video
clips of their artists that the old-fashioned record store display just
can't provide. All of these "Web publishers" are just as interested
in commercially exploiting their intellectual property, and in preventing
its unauthorized or undesired use by others, as are the traditional print
and television media. They're also just as entitled to do so under the
copyright laws.
[
back to top]
If
something doesn't have a copyright notice or something containing the
© symbol, it must not be copyrighted, so I can take it and use it however
I want.
Also not true, at least not anymore. While such a notice used to be required
when a work was published, since 1989 a work is deemed immediately and
automatically protected by copyright as soon as it is "fixed in any
tangible medium of expression," -- that is, as soon as it's committed
to paper, film, audiotape, videotape, computer file, etc., and is no longer
just an idea in its creator's head. The fact that it is subsequently published
or displayed without a copyright notice doesn't change that fact one bit.
So, just because you don't see a copyright symbol doesn't mean the graphic
or audio file you'd like to copy and use on your Web page isn't protected
by copyright; to the contrary, and particularly if it was created within
the last 10 years, it almost certainly is.
[back
to top]
But
my use is "fair use," or so I've been told, so I can't get in trouble,
right?
Maybe, but maybe not. Just remember that the use of someone else's
copyrighted material on your Web page is not a "fair use" just
because you say it is, or because one of your friends told you they thought
so. The concept of "fair use" -- which allows use of all or
part of a copyrighted work, without its owner's permission, for certain
educational and other socially-valuable purposes -- is pretty complicated,
as is the legal analysis for determining whether a given use qualifies
as "fair" or not. Before you make any assumptions that yours
is a "fair use" of a copyrighted photo, essay, poem or song,
you should at least take a careful look at the statute and some of the
rules of thumb that apply to the issue to see whether it's possible that
the copyright owner could make an argument to the contrary.
[back
to top]
But
I'm not charging people anything to view my Web site, and I'm not selling
anything; doesn't that mean I can use anything I want?
Absolutely not. Whether you're using someone else's copyrighted work for
a commercial or profit-making purpose is only one of numerous circumstances
that are required to be considered in the legal test for determining whether
the use is "fair." For example, just because you're not charging
visitors to your Web site to download an audio file or view a photograph
doesn't mean that you're not depriving the owner of that work of an opportunity
to do so, and thus cutting in on his potential profits.
[back
to top]
But
I gave credit to the original artist and/or copyright owner of the text/picture/audio
file!
That's very nice, and certainly recommended, even when you're using a
work with the owner's permission. Simply giving credit to the artist or
owner, however, doesn't necessarily affect the negative impact that your
unauthorized use of the work is having on the owner's ability to exploit
the work himself, particularly if you're using the entire work and not
just a brief excerpt or clip.
[back
to top]
But
it's free advertising for the copyright owner!
You're probably right, but again, it doesn't protect you from a claim
that you've infringed the owner's copyright. This is the argument that
has been used most often by people who want to post fan-friendly Web sites
devoted to their favorite movie or TV show, like The X-Files or Star Trek,
featuring photos, sound and video clips, fan fiction featuring the show's
characters and other such content. Simply put, however, it's up to the
copyright owner to decide whether it wants free advertising or not, and
thus whether it wants to allow fans to use such copyrighted material freely
(and/or for free!). Don't assume that the producers of your favorite TV
show, or the label that releases CDs by your favorite band, would appreciate
your posting a fan page containing their protected material -- to be entirely
safe, ask them first!
[back
to top]
What
about framing content from another Web site on my own site; that's permitted
-- isn't it?
Framing is presumptively illegal. The owners of many Web sites don't want
their content to be "framed" on another site for a number of
reasons, including the fact that they sometimes have advertisers whose
ads aren't visible when their content is framed somewhere else. When you
"frame" someone else's site, you also give the impression, at
least to the casual viewer, that the other site's content originated with
you. Again, the best policy is to ask the proprietor of the other site
for permission before framing his content on your page. While he might
refuse permission, or place some conditions on your doing so, better to
give credit where credit is due than to get a "cease and desist"
letter and/or demand for monetary damages from his lawyer.
[back
to top]
Well
I can at least link to anyone else's web page, can't I? I mean, isn't
that what the Web is all about?
Probably yes, but not definitely. It's true that "hyperlinking"
between sites is one of the Web's most distinctive and useful characteristics,
and that there is a general presumption of open access, by anyone, to
any page that someone has posted on the Web. Nonetheless, controversies
about some forms of linking are starting to arise. If you link to one
of the "internal" pages on another site, for example, you might
be bypassing paid advertising that appears on the site's opening or "home"
page. The owner of the site (not to mention his advertisers) won't be
happy, and may even have the legal right to prevent you from doing that.
Some sites also resent being linked to by people or organizations whose
political or moral beliefs they find offensive. At the risk of sounding
repetitive, the best policy is first to ask the owner of a site whether
she has any objection to your providing a link to her on your page. Odds
are, she'll be more than happy, and at the same time, you'll have protected
yourself. (Remember, too, that some commercial Web sites will even pay
you to include a link to their site, or provide you with free goods or
services, based on the number of times that one of your viewers clicks
on the link. If you'll need to generate some revenue in order to keep
your site up and running, look around for some potential "sponsors"
like these.)
[back
to top]
What
about the "metatags" for my site? Are there any limitations
on the visible or invisible "hit words" I can use so that my
site will turn up when someone does a search on a search engine?
Yes, there are. Again, you must always be careful not to run afoul of
the copyright and trademark laws. Although this is a relatively new legal
controversy, the trend in the law appears to be that the use of someone
else's protected words, terms or phrases as metatags can get you into
trouble, especially if you're in competition with the owner of the protected
language. The problem usually arises with respect to trademarks, that
is, protected business names and slogans. In the most famous case, Playboy
Enterprises sued and won an injunction against the owner of a competing
adult Web site that included the trademarked terms "playboy"
and "playmate" among its metatags. But a metatag dispute could
arise in a copyright context as well. The bottom line is that you shouldn't
use someone else's protected language as a "metatag" for your
site, even if you think it would lead to more hits on your site, and even
though the metatag would be invisible to people viewing your site.
[back
to top]
So
does all this mean I can't put any cool or interesting content on my Web
page?
Well of course not! For starters, you can always, always, post material
that is entirely original to you, and in any way, shape or form you choose.
To the greatest extent you possibly can, use the power of the Web, and
its graphic and other capabilities, as an outlet for your creativity.
As explained above, you can also use at least some materials created by
others, either for educational and/or critical purposes (but remember,
the defamation laws apply on the 'Net as well!) or with their owners'
express permission. You might be surprised how readily some copyright
holders will grant you at least limited permission to post, excerpt or
provide links to their works. Who knows, you may even reach a point where
your Web site is so sophisticated, and/or is generating enough traffic,
advertising or sales revenue, that content providers will be offering
great copyrighted content to you free of charge, or in exchange for a
license fee that, by then, you'll be willing and able to pay.
[back
to top]
|